Smoking Issues


Personal and individual rights even for minorities are a fundamental precept of our constitutional republic.

     Montana, many of whose residents are the descendents of pioneers and homesteaders and who pride themselves in their individualism and independent thinking, is being challenged by a massively financed national social engineering agenda.
     In the past three years, indoor smoking bans have been proposed in five of Montana's major cities and are being considered in at least three others. And taverns and gaming establishments, the most unlikely of places, have become a focal point of the debates.
     So far, local smoking ordinances have been enacted in four local jurisdictions in Montana, in order: Missoula, Great Falls, Helena and Bozeman. The vast majority (about 90 percent) of restaurants in all these jurisdictions are already smoke-free. Havre city government decided not to consider the issues at all, allowing free-market forces to work instead.
     Butte, too, considered a smoking ordinance a total ban proposed by the county health department but backed away from such Draconian measures for being too dictatorial toward individuals and business owners.
     In Missoula, Great Falls and Bozeman, exemptions were written into ordinances that allowed smoking in traditional tavern venues where the owner chose to allow it. Some owners of traditional taverns have chosen to prohibit smoking.
     Apparently, the reasonable approach has worked well. There are no complaints, civic strife or lawsuits in cities with exemptions.
     Only in Helena was smoking banned completely in every building accessible to the public. The negative effects there were immediate and violently felt by owners of establishments licensed for adult beverages and gambling.
     Business fell off dramatically and may have cost owners upwards of $4 million in total sales' it was reported by the Gambling Control Division that it cost licensed gaming operators $843,000 in gaming revenue in just six months.
     Currently, the city is torn between private property rights/adult choice advocates and social engineers who wish to legislate and micro-manage personal behavior...and private businesses.
     The Helena ban was overturned on constitutional grounds that it did not offer those charged with violating the ordinance a chance for a jury trial. That decision has been appealed by the city to district court.
     In the meantime, licensed operators who stood to lose their business' equity and real estate and were headed toward insolvency, filed a suit contending their property was being illegally devalued or taken.
     That suit is on hold in district court while another suit is awaiting a decision from the state Supreme Court.
     When it became clear, after just six months in place, that Helena's total smoking ban was wreaking havoc on the city's hospitality businesses, and would substantially reduce to the state the flow of needed gaming tax revenues, a bi-partisan majority in the 2003 Legislature enacted HB 758, which made the state's Clean Indoor Air Act pre-eminent when it came to businesses licensed by the state for gaming.
     HB 758 in effect exempted gaming establishments from smoking bans, unless owners chose to prohibit smoking on their own. Under current state law, if a local jurisdiction were to reduce gaming revenues, other jurisdictions would be required to fund those losses.
     Further, if a single source of revenue was reduced by five percent or more, the state could simply make major reallocations of revenues already promised to local government through reimbursement. While Helena alone could likely not force gaming revenues to that five percent threshold, legislators realized one or two other jurisdictions could.
     But the City of Helena challenged HB 758's constitutionality on several grounds in district court, then asked the state Supreme Court to take jurisdiction. Briefs from the smoking prohibitionists and the Attorney General's office, which is defending the law vigorously, were filed in late 2003 and early 2004.
     Oral arguments were presented to the court in April of 2004. A decision was expected by some knowledgeable observers in August, perhaps as late as September. As of early December, no decision has been forthcoming.

Source: Publications of Continental Communications, 125 W. Granite St., Suite 102, Butte, MT 59701, including the monthly industry trade journal The Montana Tavern Times, the Extras, a series of in-depth special supplements to the Tavern Times.