article archives

Quickly search for past articles.


Gaming council setting agenda

Pub Date: 6/1/2009

 Gaming Advisory Council develops year's agenda

By Cole Boehler

    No effective organization can go about accomplishing its mission without developing a comprehensive agenda first. And that's primarily what the Gaming Advisory Council (GAC) set out to do —and accomplished—when it met at the Hilton Garden Inn in Missoula May 19.
    But first the Council welcomed back State Senator Joe Tropila (D-Great Falls), who had left the council early in 2008, but was recently reappointed by Senate leadership.
    In addition, the Council welcomed Rep. Pat Noonan (D-Butte) who had just been appointed by the House Speaker. (Watch for a profile of Rep. Noonan in a future edition of the Montana Tavern Times).
    The full Council was present with the exception of Nick Murnion, Garfield County Attorney who represents county governments, who was excused.
    Liquor Control Division Administrator Shauna Helfert was first called upon and asked to report on actions of the recently adjourned Legislature regarding liquor law.
    She told the Council House Bill 195 had passed, which amended the statute governing restaurant beer and wine licenses to eliminate the "preference" accorded unsuccessful past license lottery applicants when they applied in a subsequent lottery.
    The preference given applicants who have operated a bona fide restaurant for one year or more prior to application remains in place, Helfert noted.
    She said the bill also altered the definition of "restaurant" to require service of an evening meal at least four times weekly between 5 and 11 p.m., and the majority of its food served in non-throw-away containers.
    Helfert said the Legislature authorized Montana breweries to make stronger specialty beers than previously allowed, with up to 14 percent alcohol by weight. In addition, she said the Legislature has mandated that alcohol-laced energy drinks will henceforth be handled under the same regimen as spirits, purchased by licensed retailers only through the state warehouse.
    She discussed HB211, which was withdrawn in favor of a compromise that called for changes in administrative rules to authorize an alternative penalty schedule for sales-to-minors violations which would apply to licensees who have certifiably trained servers in an approved program within 30 days of hire.
    Helfert said the Department of Revenue has a training program that can be administered by 86 trainers throughout the state, but that other viable programs such as TIPS may also be recognized and used.
    John Tooke, council chairman, said he hoped the ultimate aim of the rules—to lessen the incidence of illegal sales to minors—would be fully realized.
    Acting Gambling Control Division (GCD) Administrator Rick Ask was called upon to discuss legislation that affects legal gaming. He noted just one bill practically encapsulated all the relevant gaming legislation, Senate Bill 86 carried by Sen. Tropila.
     That bill, known as a "clean up bill," passed almost unanimously and has been signed by the Governor. It comprised the legislative initiatives of the GCD and the GAC.
     It allowed some format changes to bingo cards, updated raffle laws and shifted raffle regulatory authority to the GCD, created a new license for gambling "associated businesses" such as machine recyclers and accounting software package developers, changed fingerprinting standards to conform with the FBI's, clarified card room contractor licensing requirements, restricted use of credit cards to obtain cash advances for gambling purposes and so on.
    Ask then presented draft rules which would implement the provisions of SB86.
    Neil Peterson, in the audience representing the Gaming Industry Association, asked that the rules draft governing the "associated businesses" license clarify the legislative intent, and to not unintentionally snare anyone who has access to proprietary gaming information such as business attorneys and accountants.
    Ask said such clarification "would certainly be considered" and that a GCD letter stated their intent to apply the law narrowly. "To attempt to license another profession would call for new, specific rules," Ask said.
    The provision restricting use of credit cards to obtain cash for gambling drew some discussion, with one council member, Tim Carson representing industry, seeking assurances the prohibition would not interfere with a card holder's ability to obtain cash from an ATM machine where a "personal identification number" (PIN) is used.
    Ask said as far as GCD was concerned, and in conformance with legislative intent, that kind of transaction is between a card holder and the card issuer. He did, however, concede the matter would benefit from further clarification in rule.
    Peterson interjected that the intent was never to legislate how ATMs could be made to function.
    From the audience, Mark Staples, representing the Montana Tavern Association, asked how, if cash used for gambling and obtained from an ATM was prohibited, it could ever be enforced.
    "Would licensees be responsible for monitoring how people used ATMs? Would operators be required to remove all ATMs that accept credit cards?" he asked. "I believe such an interpretation would go too far. The premise owner should have to be directly complicit in the use of a credit card" to obtain cash for gambling purposes before an action should be brought against that licensee, he said.
    Audience member Steve Arntzen of Century Gaming suggested the key language in the rule needed to reference the use of a PIN number to obtain a cash advance, which would clearly recognize the ATM transaction as one simply between card holder and card issuer.
    Ask acknowledged the rules draft did not specifically address ATMs, and said the Division would "work with industry to come up with a better understanding and language."
    The Council then voted to ask the Division to present revised rules language at the next GAC meeting, which is scheduled for Oct. 23.
    The Council then heard a report from Ask regarding illegal "bunco" games, one of which was recently shut down in Glendive. He said his understanding was that the dice game was being played elsewhere and that he would get the word out regarding the game's legal status (see the Rick Ask column elsewhere in this edition).
    Ask then reviewed recent gaming statistics, particularly video gaming machine tax collections for January-March, 2009. He noted collections were slightly ahead of the same quarter last year but up markedly from the previous quarter, which posted a 5 percent decline (see complete reports and statistics on tax collections elsewhere in this issue).
    Council chairman Tooke asked Ben Kamerzel, GCD test lab chief, who was in the audience, to report on the status of gaming submissions and approvals, noting he was glad to see GCD had added another full-time lab engineer.
    Kamerzel said work was being turned out at an increasing velocity, but that game submissions and complexity were also increasing, acknowledging "there are always concerns things aren't progressing as quickly as they should."
    He also noted additional engineering testing is required surrounding the implementation of the newly authorized thermal printers in place of conventional impact printers, and portable USB data storage devices in place of printed paper audit rolls. He also said he was "impressed with the speed with which manufacturers are adopting this new technology for new machines and even for retrofitting existing machines."
    Kamerzel said, "Process time is tough to quantify," but that it takes approximately 29 days for approval of machine modifications such as glass changes, video screen replacements and software upgrades, and that it is taking about 63 days for an entirely new game platforms to be approved.
    He also noted the "smooth, fast approvals" come when manufacturers have obtained approval of game concepts in advance of submission, and when they respond quickly to "change requests." In some cases, further delays are encountered when a manufacturer submits additional enhancements with a response to a change request.
    He said bonus features are increasingly "nested"—bonuses within bonuses—and that now various versions of each game are often submitted, all of which increase the work load and can slow the process.
    After a lunch break, Chairman Tooke requested a discussion on a suggested agenda item dealing with bill acceptors. Some had requested the rules governing the devices be studied to see if Montana could conform more closely to what is commonly used in other jurisdictions, including Indian reservations here.
    Most bill acceptors are manufactured with the capability to validate 50-dollar and 100-dollar bills built in, but those features are disabled when the devices are installed in Montana. Some engineering designs also require that machine software communicate with bill acceptor software, so any change in the bill acceptors could require upgrades in machine operating software as well, it was noted.
    Staples said he thought it might be beneficial, too, if MTA include the item in its future deliberations in order that it can develop a position to share with GAC.
    Council members agreed the matter could be complex but was subject to consideration so asked GCD to develop a "white paper" to help elucidate the issue, which is to be taken up at subsequent GAC meetings.
    Carson said business input suggested some revisions in live card games rules could enhance the game for players and operators. But, having had an extensive study of the matter two years ago which resulted in only minor changes, Carson acknowledged a review of past work would be beneficial.
    He requested GCD provide the working papers of the 2005-2006 subcommittee for council study prior to taking the matter up again at the next GAC meeting.
    Another item the Council decided to add to its future agenda was continuing efforts to streamline the liquor/gaming license amendment process in cases where no new party is contemplated being added to the license.
    Removing a party to a license due to, for example, divorce or death currently triggers a rerun of the entire application process, including complete re-investigations of those already on the license and already investigated. Ask offered, and the Council accepted, GCD staff input in the pending discussions.
    Ask noted there is some consensus developing that there could be some legal variations to traditional "sports boards" that the GAC might want to consider. He suggested GCD investigator Tom Oberweiser attend the next council meeting to provide a briefing and members readily concurred.
    Carson noted currently 86 percent of VGMs are reporting data electronically via the state's web-based system, but said the division has budgeted $50,000 annually to enhance the system, so wanted an idea of how they planned to progress.
    Ask said more operators than earlier expected are reporting via direct-screen entry rather than though custom accounting packages. He said work on enhancing the direct-screen entry process might be most beneficial.
    He added the division was interested in hearing ideas on system enhancement from all user groups. Heidi Schmalz of Century Gaming, and route vendor Clint Lohman, have been tasked to develop a suggested list of improvements.
    With that, the Council set its next meeting date tentatively for Oct. 23 in Helena, then adjourned.

Source:  The Montana Tavern Times, May 2009, published monthly by Continental Communications, 125 W Granite, Suite 102, Butte, MT 59701.